Professional identification

Professional Identification is a type of social identification and is the sense of oneness individuals have with a profession (e.g. law, medicine) and the degree to which individuals define themselves as profession members.[1][2][3][4]

Contents

Sources of Professional Identification

Researchers have found that a desire for quality (rather than profits) is associated with professional identification. [5] Organizations tend to be concerned with efficiency and profitability, whereas professions care mainly about providing the highest-quality service (as defined by the professions), almost regardless of cost or revenue considerations (Freidson, 2001). Administrators are usually seen as promoting profitability at the expense of profession-defined quality (Freidson, 2001).[6] In one notable study, practicing physicians viewed administrators with medical degrees (MDs) as “outsiders” to the medical profession because of what the physicians believed to be the administrators’ undue emphasis on organizational goals (Hoff, 1999: 336). Practicing physicians viewed administrators with MDs more negatively than those without MDs because the former were thought to have “betrayed” the medical profession by assuming administrative roles (Hoff, 1999: 344).[7]

Recent Research

For over 50 years, researchers have studied whether or not professional employees' social identities influence their work behaviors. [8] David R. Hekman and colleagues recently found that professional identification actually conflicts with organizational identification.[9] Organizational identification leads employees to believe that administrators are “like them” and “on their side," whereas professional identification leads employees to believe that administrators are “not like them” and “not on their side.” [10]

Measurement Items

Mael & Ashforth's (1989) scale is most commonly used to measure professional identification.[11]

References

  1. ^ Ashforth B. E., & Mael F. A. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
  2. ^ Cheney G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
  3. ^ Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., & Harquail C. V. (1994). Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
  4. ^ Pratt, M.G., (1998). To be or not to be: Central Questions in organizational identification. In Whetten D.A., & Godfrey P.C. (Eds.): Identity in Organizations: Building theory through conversation (pp.171- 207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. ^ Bamber, E.W. & Iyer, V.M. 2002. Big 5 auditors' professional and organizational identification: consistency or conflict? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory
  6. ^ Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism: The third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. ^ Hoff, T. J. 1999. The social organization of physician-managers in a changing HMO. Work and Occupations, 26: 324 –351.
  8. ^ Gouldner, A. W. 1957. Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2: 281–306.
  9. ^ Hekman, D.R., Steensma, H.K., Bigley, G.A., Hereford, J.F., (2009) “Effects of Organizational and Professional Identification on the Relationship Between Administrators’ Social Influence and Professional Employees' Adoption of New Work Behavior.” Journal of Applied Psychology.
  10. ^ Hekman, D.R., Steensma, H.K., Bigley, G.A., Hereford, J.F., (2009) Hekman, D.R., Bigley, G.A., Steensma, H.K., Hereford, J.F., (2009) “Combined Effects of Organizational and Professional Identification on the Reciprocity Dynamic for Professional Employees.” Academy of Management Journal. Volume 52, Number 3. http://journals.aomonline.org/inpress/main.asp?action=preview&art_id=473&p_id=1&p_short=AMJ
  11. ^ Mael, F. & Ashforth, B. 1992. Alumni and their alma maters: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 103-123.